- Americans don't torture because it is wrong to do so,
- Torturing people is contrary to both American law and America's international treaty obligations.
- Government lawyers who wrote opinions as to what interrogation practices were and were not legal.
- Government scientists who summarized the evidence as to the efficacy of different interrogation processes on different kinds of subjects.
Certainly the people who actually inflict torture are guilty, and as I understand our justice system, one who refuses to obey illegal instructions is in theory safe from retaliation.
We know enough about the willingness of people to carry out unethical orders to understand that the people who give those orders have to be held responsible.
It would seem that people who seek to provide cover for torture by producing false findings on the legality and necessity of torture are also guilty, but how do you understand the intentions of the authors of reports written in the past? How do you determine whether erroneous conclusions are deliberate falsifications or honest mistakes?
The Obama administration may be well advised to refrain from proceedings against knowledge workers. On the other hand, I hope they will proceed against those who ordered torture and those who tortured.
1 comment:
While I think the government ought to protect the generation of scientific and legal knowledge even on so sensitive a matter as torture, it occurs to me that not only can that knowledge be misused for unethical purposes, but it may also complicate decision making.
I make the point often that we think with our brains, not only with our minds. We make decisions with limited rationality.
Would it make unethical use of torture more likely were decision makers to be told it was an effective way of obtaining intelligence? Perhaps it should not do so, put it probably would make torture more likely. Indeed, simply presenting the information to decision makers would be likely to encourage them to accept it as relevant to the decision.
Similarly, presenting decision makers with findings about the legality of torture would probably increase the probability that they would focus on legality rather than ethics of the decision.
The way one frames a decision making situation affects the decisions that are made!
Post a Comment