Monday, December 07, 2009

"It looks like ‘microlending’ doesn’t actually do much to fight poverty"

My friend Julianne suggested this article from the Boston Globe. I quote:
two new research papers suggest that microcredit is not nearly the powerful tool it has been made out to be. The papers, by leading development economists affiliated with MIT’s Jameel Poverty Action Lab, have not yet been published, but they are already being called the most thorough, careful studies yet done on the topic. What they find is that, by most measures, microcredit does not offer a way out of poverty. It helps a few of the more entrepreneurial poor to start up businesses, and at the margins it may boost the profits of existing microenterprises, but that doesn’t translate into gains for the borrowers, as measured by indicators like income, spending, health, or education. In fact, most microcredit clients actually spend their borrowed money not on a business, but on household expenses, on paying off other debts or on a relatively big-ticket item like a TV or a daughter’s wedding. And while microcredit champions point to microloans as a tool for empowering women, the studies see no impact on gender roles, and find evidence that if any one group benefits more, it’s male entrepreneurs with existing businesses.
Comment: I guess I have been around too long, but I have given up on silver bullets to end poverty.

Still, microcredit programs do have a place in the development pantheon. They can make a big difference for a few people, some difference for many.
JAD

No comments: