The word "need" always bothers me since it is sometimes used to mean "something without which we can not live" and some times "something someone thinks we should have". In the latter sense, there seem to have been many situations in the past where donors have used the concept of "need" to provide something other than that which the recipient wants most. I suspect that what Arthur means by "need" in the sentence is "something which society will devote resources to obtain if possible".
Arthur is an economist and has an expansive view of the economy. I would suggest that there are needs -- such as the need for love and nurturing that is met by the family and community or the need for religious belief and support that is met by religious institutions -- that are not economic. There are technologies that play economic roles within the institutions of the family (e.g. household technologies) and church (e.g. construction and architectural technologies) but there are aspects of both that I would prefer to see as other than economic.
This is one of a number of postings on The Nature of Technology.
- An example of science leading to the recognition of technological needs
- Still More on Brian Arthur's The Nature of Technology
- The Perceptual Illusion About Technology
- Some Reviews of The Nature of Technology
- More on the Nature of Technology
- Technology Deepening
- HIV/AIDS and the links between science and technology
- Thoughts on invention on reading Brian Arthur's book
- Classification and Technology
- A Thought About Engineering and Technology
- More on Arthur's Nature of Technology
- The Nature of Technology
No comments:
Post a Comment